Stronger Western Blot Manipulation Detection
Imagetwin’s manipulation detection now covers a broader range of alterations in Western blots, and does so even more accurately than before.
What's New
We have released a new detection model that expands coverage and improves accuracy across all manipulation types:
- Vertical splices: the most common type flagged on PubPeer
- Horizontal splices: typically indicative of deliberate alteration
- Copy-paste forgeries: detected where the manipulation results in at least a partial alteration around the forged area
Previously, these were treated as separate detection tasks. Going forward, we handle them under a single umbrella: manipulation detection. Whether a region was spliced in or cloned from elsewhere, what matters is that the image shows an inconsistency, and we flag it.
Detection Performance
The new model outperforms its predecessor on every metric we track:
- False positive rate down from 2.4% to 1.7%
- Detection rate up by 14 percentage points on splices
- Additional gains on copy-paste forgeries and horizontal splices
What You See in the Interface
When a Western blot is flagged, you now see two things: the original panel, and a color-coded version of it where suspicious regions are highlighted. Areas of concern appear in color – the brighter, the more suspicious. You can adjust the transparency and apply filters to either or both sides to investigate further.
The overall result is summarized as a single alteration score for the image. If something looks off, it shows as “1 Alteration,” regardless of whether it’s a splice, a horizontal cut, or a copy-paste forgery.
Looking Ahead
Western blots are just the beginning. We are currently looking into extending manipulation detection to other image types, such as microscopic images, FACS plots, and light photography.
Manipulation detection is available through the web application and the API.
Frequently asked questions
How does Imagetwin detect Western blot manipulation?
Imagetwin’s manipulation detection model identifies vertical splices, horizontal splices, and copy-paste forgeries in Western blot images. Suspicious regions are highlighted in a color-coded overlay directly in the interface, with brighter areas indicating higher concern. The current false positive rate is 1.7%, and detection rate on splices improved by 14 percentage points with the latest model update.
Is Imagetwin or Proofig better for Western blot analysis?
Both tools detect Western blot manipulation. Imagetwin’s latest model covers vertical splices, horizontal splices, and copy-paste forgeries under a unified detection framework, with a 1.7% false positive rate. Beyond Western blots, Imagetwin also screens for cross-publication image plagiarism against a database of 160M+ published figures, detects AI-generated images, and integrates directly into publisher workflows including ScholarOne and Wiley’s Research Exchange. For publishers and institutions that need both manipulation detection and cross-publication screening in one tool, Imagetwin covers both.
What types of image manipulation can Imagetwin detect?
Imagetwin detects manipulation across several categories: splicing (vertical and horizontal cuts), copy-paste forgeries, duplication within and across publications, and AI-generated figures. Western blot detection is currently the most developed, with expansion underway to microscopy images, FACS plots, and light photography. Detection is available via the web application and API.